It is still amazing that in the new millennium, Intense Pulsed Light technicians are still taking risks with their clients when choosing appropriate settings for treatments. Specifically, the choice of energy settings with different types of skins, and in particular skins with a mixed genetic pool. The professional practice of determining potential outcomes when using light based therapies is called Risk Assessment.

Any skin care professional undertaking treatments using light based devices should be aware of the risks involved. These risks manifest themselves in burns or post treatment pigmentation problems and are usually caused by inappropriate energy settings or technique due to incorrect assessment of the Fitzpatrick skin tone and the individuals reaction to the light source.

In this age of technology, there is really no excuse for “guessing” likely reaction to light based devices, and with the more diverse cross-ethnicity in society, it is only too easy to make a mistake.
This cross-ethnicity is producing more skins that appear to be darker, but are carrying the MCR1 gene. It is here that there is more of a risk for unpredictable effects.


P
rofessionalism & credibility

Photodermatological research has established that the most accurate method of determining the Fitzpatrick type and it’s reaction to various light sources is to measure the melanin content and erythema levels of the skin across a minimum of three areas of the body that represent minimal, moderate and maximum levels of sun exposure.
The technology to do this comes in the form of a device that measures the rate of absorption and reflection of specific wavelengths of light.  This method of  testing is universally recognised as the most accurate and consequently found in professional dermatological devices.
With this knowledge, we can assess the average rate that Melanogenesis occurs within a clients skin, and more accurately predict the response to the Intense Pulsed Light, choosing energy settings accordingly. This should be undertaken before test patches or initial treatment is commenced, and in between treatments to monitor changing melanin levels.
With the ability to measure the levels of Melanin and Erythema in the skin we are more readily able to monitor changes in between treatments and adjust device settings to avoid potential problems.
The use of devices to determine the rate at which Melanogenesis occurs within skin is also used to measure the efficiacy of sunscreens and suntanning equipment.

Proliferation of IPL technology

With the dramatic increased use of light based devices by skin care therapists, there understandably comes a corresponding increase in unsatisfactory outcomes.
These are commonly due to inadequate training and lack of the fundamentals required to perform these treatments safely and correctly. In fact, some users of IPL devices have received little more training than a day covering the device operation.
It is this considerable variation in standards of training from device marketers where the use of measuring devices can play a vital role in reducing risk.


Measuring the rate of absorption and reflection of specific wavelengths of light is universally recognised as the most accurate method of determining melanin desity in the skin

     

Unsatisfactory outcomes from lack of correct consulatation, risk assessment and test patch analysis

Health insurance and accident compensation organisations in both New Zealand and Australia are reviewing a number of cases of inadequate consultation, risk assessment and test patch protocols that have resulted in unsatisfactory outcomes such as scarring and pigmentation issues.
Some of these may prove to be costly oversights for the practitioners who provided the treatments, particularly if investigations deem litigation appropriate.

If the frequency of these instances increases enough to attract the attention of regional health authorities, there may be a likelihood that non-medically trained personnel will loose the ability to provide these light based treatments. This would be a disaster for professional skin treatment therapy.

We now have quality internationally accredited training and affordable tools at our disposal to help ensure this does not happen, and whether we choose to employ them is a clear indication to our clients of our professionalism.

 

© 2006 Fleming Institute of Aesthetic Technology    


Click here to return to beautymagonline.com